tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21446920.post8650954311524000569..comments2023-03-31T09:19:05.547+01:00Comments on Rugby Town.... (Much more than just cement.): U-TurnLilianhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17194634698841428036noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21446920.post-21895599039104660772008-04-02T21:00:00.000+01:002008-04-02T21:00:00.000+01:00its a government calculator - gives you the figure...its a government calculator - gives you the figure they want us to have.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21446920.post-87395972264382341302008-03-20T23:18:00.000+00:002008-03-20T23:18:00.000+00:00MY BRAIN HURTS!According to Cemex and RBC on Minut...MY BRAIN HURTS!<BR/><BR/>According to Cemex and RBC on Minutes of the Rugby Cement Community Forum (RBC web) it says that 9 tonnes an hour are burnt in the KILN, and 16 tph in the CALCINER making total FUEL 25 tph? Now, if my old school log tables are not wrong, nor my abacus, then there are, in the calciner, 16 tph being replaced by 6 tph tyres plus 15 tph "climafuel/RDF" which equals 21 tph, now replacing the "original 16 tph?" That makes well over 100% replacement - nearer 140%? Yes - or no?<BR/><BR/>Can anyone else explain how the EA makes this only 30% replacement, or is my brain hurting for a reason?<BR/><BR/>Mathematically challenged JIM.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com