tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21446920.post7473321746464782518..comments2023-03-31T09:19:05.547+01:00Comments on Rugby Town.... (Much more than just cement.): ON THE WARPATHLilianhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17194634698841428036noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21446920.post-41914011480521816132007-06-17T13:34:00.000+01:002007-06-17T13:34:00.000+01:00Rumour has it that the gang of three - Cemex, RBC ...Rumour has it that the gang of three - Cemex, RBC and Agency - are trying to shut down the Community Forum and get it moved back to the cement plant where it can be "properly controlled".<BR/><BR/>Check out RBC Cabinet item 13 of Sean Lawson on 27 June. It says the RCCF was only set up as a "short term action when the initial application for the use of tyres was submitted", presumably in order to get the cement plant turned into a CO-INCINERATOR, by the carrot of "promised consultation and full and open and honest dialogue"?<BR/><BR/>This is yet another pigs CAN fly in Rugby story!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21446920.post-53852349653430810122007-06-15T17:05:00.000+01:002007-06-15T17:05:00.000+01:00You can read more about it on the Committee Papers...You can read more about it on the Committee Papers for the Sustainable Environment Panel meeting 14 December 2006 on RBC web, and Resources 2 January 2007. Note item 18 : "Officers were asked to investigate whether or not tyres were being burned on the actual day that the pollution incident was reported." And....<BR/><BR/>Note the NAMES of ALL councillors who have agreed that the Tyre Trials are not satisfactory, and who oppose their being burnt at Rugby Cement.<BR/><BR/>CABINET:Humphrey;Campbell;Lane;Pawsey;<BR/>Poole;Robbins;Timms;Wright;<BR/>RESOURCES AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE:Shera;Edwards;Bell;Collett;Elson; Kaur;Holman;Leigh-Hunt;Mistry;Roodhouse;Sandison;Sewell;Watson;<BR/>ENVIRONMENT PANEL:Holman;Sandison;Bragg;Cassedy;Day;Kaur;New;Parker;Watson; Williams.<BR/><BR/>So why did they all agree this report against Cemex and the Agency?<BR/>Is it just a lot of hot air?<BR/>Do they not have the courage of their convictions? <BR/>Or do they not truly believe what they say?<BR/>They should put their money where their mouth is!<BR/>And FUND and SUPPORT Lilian's action, and back up their own claims in the RBC REPORT against the Agency.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com